Scientists Discover Extraordinary Ancient Chromosome Fossils in 52,000-Year-Old Mammoth

A collaborative study uncovered preserved ancient chromosome structures in a 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth, providing unprecedented insights into its genetics and the conditions that allowed such preservation, drawing parallels with freeze-dried food techniques.

A breakthrough now makes it possible to assemble the genomes of extinct species.

A team of scientists from Baylor College of Medicine, the University of Copenhagen, and the Centre Nacional d’Anàlisi Genòmica and Centre for Genomic Regulation have discovered fossils of ancient chromosomes in the remains of a woolly mammoth that died 52,000 years ago. These fossils preserve the structure of the ancient chromosomes at a nanometer scale – billionths of a meter. The discovery is featured on the cover of Cell.

“We’ve known that tiny fragments of ancient DNA can survive for long periods of time,” said Dr. Marcela Sandoval-Velasco of the Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics at the University of Copenhagen and co-first author of the new study. “But what we found here is a sample where the three-dimensional arrangement of these DNA fragments was frozen in place for tens of millennia, thereby preserving the structure of the whole chromosome.”

Revolutionary Tools for Genetic Research

Fossil chromosomes are a powerful new tool for studying the history of life on Earth. That’s because typical ancient DNA fragments are rarely longer than 100 base pairs, or 100 letters of the genetic code – far smaller than the full DNA sequence of an organism, which is often billions of letters long. By contrast, fossil chromosomes can span hundreds of millions of genetic letters.

“By comparing ancient DNA molecules to the DNA sequences of modern species, it’s possible to find cases where single letters of the genetic code have changed,” said co-first and co-corresponding author Dr. Olga Dudchenko, assistant professor of molecular and human genetics at the Center for Genome Architecture at Baylor College of Medicine and senior investigator at the Center for Theoretical Biological Physics at Rice University. “Fossil chromosomes are a game-changer because knowing the shape of an organism’s chromosomes makes it possible to assemble the entire DNA sequence of extinct creatures. This enables the types of insights that would not have been possible before.”

Since the fossil chromosomes came from a mammoth, one of the first things the team did was to determine the number of chromosomes that the woolly mammoth possessed. “We found that they had 28 pairs of chromosomes, which makes a lot of sense, because that’s what modern elephants have, and they are the woolly mammoth’s closest living relative,” said Dr. Juan Antonio Rodríguez, co-first author of the study and a researcher at the University of Copenhagen and at Centre Nacional d’Anàlisi Genòmica in Barcelona, Spain. “It was extremely exciting to be able to count the chromosomes of an extinct creature for the first time. It’s usually not possible to have this much fun simply counting from one to 28.”

Insights into Mammoth Genetics

By examining the fossil chromosomes, which derived from the mammoth’s skin, it was possible to see which genes were active. This is because of a phenomenon called chromosome compartmentalization – the fact that active and inactive DNA tends to segregate into two spatial neighborhoods inside the cell nucleus. For most genes, the activity state matches what researchers saw in modern elephant skin. But not always.

“The obvious question for us was: why is it a ‘woolly mammoth’? Why isn’t it a ‘shockingly bald mammoth’?” said Dr. Thomas Gilbert, director of the Center for Hologenomics and co-corresponding author of the paper. “The fact that the compartmentalization was still preserved in these fossils was critical, because it made it possible to look, for the very first time, at which genes were active in a woolly mammoth. And it turns out that there are key genes that regulate hair follicle development whose activity pattern is totally different than in elephants.”

The researchers saw more than just compartmentalization in the shape of these ancient chromosomes. In fact, the chromosomes shared many structural features with modern chromosomes. The most spectacular of these features was also the tiniest: chromatin loops, structures as small as 50nm that the Baylor team had mapped in humans, for the first time, only 10 years ago.

“The survival of loops in these ancient chromosomes is perhaps the most impressive part,” said ICREA Research Professor Marc A. Marti-Renom, co-corresponding author on the study and group leader at Centre Nacional d’Anàlisi Genòmica, as well as the Centre for Genomic Regulation, both in Barcelona, Spain. “DNA loops, which are only 50 nanometers in size, are important because they bring activating DNA sequences close to their gene targets. So, these fossils don’t just show us which genes were active – they show us why.”

Yet the researchers were left with a puzzle: how could the DNA fragments of ancient chromosomes possibly survive for 52,000 years with their three-dimensional structure intact? After all, in 1905 – his ‘annus mirabilis,’ or ‘miracle year’ – Albert Einstein published a classic paper calculating how quickly small particles, like bits of DNA, tend to move through a substance. “Einstein’s work makes a very simple prediction about chromosome fossils: under ordinary circumstances, they shouldn’t exist,” Dudchenko said. “And yet: here they are. It was a physics mystery!”

Solving a Prehistoric Puzzle

To explain this apparent contradiction, the researchers realized that the chromosome fossils were in a very special state, closely resembling the state of molecules in glass. “Chromoglass is a lot like the glass in your window: it’s rigid, but it’s not an ordered crystal,” said Dr. Erez Lieberman Aiden, co-corresponding author of the study, director of the Center for Genome Architecture and professor at the Baylor College of Medicine. “If you zoom in on the individual particles, a piece of glass – or a piece of chromoglass – is basically a bumper-to-bumper nano-scale traffic jam, in a world with no lane markers. Individual particles, or individual fragments of ancient DNA, just can’t move very far in that situation. Even if you wait for thousands and thousands of years.”

The idea that the mammoth remains, unearthed in 2018 in Siberian permafrost, were preserved in a glass-like state is not so farfetched. Without realizing it, many civilizations developed ways to induce a “glass transition” in their food as a way to preserve it, usually by a combination of cooling and dehydration. This resulted in foods, like tortilla chips and beef jerky – that are more brittle than the original food, but that last much longer. And it is why the glass transition has become a key concept for modern food scientists. Essentially, the researchers discovered that the chromosome fossils had been trapped inside a piece of freeze-dried woolly mammoth jerky.

“We confirmed this theory by doing experiments on old, freeze-dried beef jerky, which is much easier to find than woolly mammoth jerky,” explained Dr. Cynthia Pérez Estrada, co-first author of the study and a researcher at the Center for Genome Architecture and at Rice University’s Center for Theoretical Biological Physics. “We fired a shotgun at it. We ran over it with a car. We had a former starting pitcher for the Houston Astros throw a fastball at it. Each time, the jerky broke into tiny bits – shattering like a glass. But at the nano-scale, the chromosomes were intact, unchanged. That’s the reason these fossils can survive. That’s the reason that they were there, 52,000 years later, just waiting for us to find them.”

For more on this study, see Unveiling the Woolly Mammoth Genome With Groundbreaking DNA Technology.

Reference: “Three-dimensional genome architecture persists in a 52,000-year-old woolly mammoth skin sample” by Marcela Sandoval-Velasco, Olga Dudchenko, Juan Antonio Rodríguez, Cynthia Pérez Estrada, Marianne Dehasque, Claudia Fontsere, Sarah S.T. Mak, Ruqayya Khan, Vinícius G. Contessoto, Antonio B. Oliveira Junior, Achyuth Kalluchi, Bernardo J. Zubillaga Herrera, Jiyun Jeong, Renata P. Roy, Ishawnia Christopher, David Weisz, Arina D. Omer, Sanjit S. Batra, Muhammad S. Shamim, Neva C. Durand, Brendan O’Connell, Alfred L. Roca, Maksim V. Plikus, Mariya A. Kusliy, Svetlana A. Romanenko, Natalya A. Lemskaya, Natalya A. Serdyukova, Svetlana A. Modina, Polina L. Perelman, Elena A. Kizilova, Sergei I. Baiborodin, Nikolai B. Rubtsov, Gur Machol, Krisha Rath, Ragini Mahajan, Parwinder Kaur, Andreas Gnirke, Isabel Garcia-Treviño, Rob Coke, Joseph P. Flanagan, Kelcie Pletch, Aurora Ruiz-Herrera, Valerii Plotnikov, Innokentiy S. Pavlov, Naryya I. Pavlova, Albert V. Protopopov, Michele Di Pierro, Alexander S. Graphodatsky, Eric S. Lander, M. Jordan Rowley, Peter G. Wolynes, José N. Onuchic, Love Dalén, Marc A. Marti-Renom, M. Thomas P. Gilbert and Erez Lieberman Aiden, 11 July 2024, Cell.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.002